Week 7: Assignment – Signature Assignment: Healthcare Initiative Paper Assignment Prompt You have been chosen by your healthcare organization to investigate and recommend a major healthcare system initiative. This initiative should support and drive excellence in patient care, directly or indirectly. Your objective is to provide the leadership team with a comprehensive overview of the initiative you choose that is supported with research and data. Prepare a formal review/overview of a Healthcare System Initiative that directly or indirectly drives excellence in patient care. Examples include but are not limited to: ANCC Magnet Journey Trauma Center Verification ANCC Pathway to Excellence Certification for Primary Stroke Center Primary Care Medical Home Certification New BSN Graduate Nurse Residency Program The paper will include (but is not limited to) the following: An introduction that identifies and explores the significance of the initiative, a body with sections separated usi

Expert Answer and Explanation

Implementation of Healthcare System Initiative

The specialty hospitals such as the trauma center specialize in the management of specific patient needs. For example, the trauma center focuses on delivering health care services to people with injuries including victims of accidents. Like any other hospital, a trauma center is subject to the regulations and standards that dictate the procedures involved in care delivery, and a healthcare organization that specializes in this area, therefore, should commit to comply with these standards.

To ensure compliance, the organization invites a team of experts to assess the organization’s services against the established standards, pinpointing flaws and strengths. This process is significance in the sense that it helps optimize the quality of health services for the trauma patients. The success of the Trauma Center Verification (TCV), as the process is popularly known, depends on numerous factors including leadership style, communication strategies, and the change management theories used as described in this paper.

Problem Statement

Although providers of medical services are required to meet certain quality and safety standards, cases of medical malpractice are still common, and they largely stem from noncompliance to the protocol for care delivery. In 2013, for example, a patient at Cony Island Hospital lost his life following the blood transfusion error caused by the wrong identification of the patient’s blood type (Oginski, n.d.). This is one of the many incidences which happen when hospitals fail to comply with the laid down standards, and some of these events may cause an increase in the medical expenses.

Some of the negative outcomes associated with malpractice stem from the lack of verification of the trauma center. Due to the lack of verification, these centers may not be in a position to gauge whether they are doing certain things right, and this may potentially expose the organization to the risk of mistakes. To cushion itself against these problems, a trauma center should undergo a verification process.

Review of Literature Related to the Initiative

A number of literature sources explore the subject of the TCV in terms of purpose, effectiveness and benefits. El-Menyar and colleagues (2020), for example, examine whether accrediting the organization can translate to better clinical outcomes, and their results confirm a hypothesis that TVC can bring positive impact to the hospital, and to the patients by reducing hospitalization. However, not everyone see verification as a solution to the clinical issues such as poor quality of treatment because some studies have yielded results that contradict El-Menyar et al. (2020).

Botomen et al. (2021) found that verification does not guarantee a hospital success in terms of the outcomes of the patient care.  Botomen et al. (2021), however, used only 20 subjects for their study, and their results may not be valid.  If one were to consider the validity of the studies to make decisions, therefore, El-Menyar et al. (2020) would be ideal evidence source.

The approaches used in the TCV largely determine the outcomes of the TVC, and a hospital should take this into account when thinking of undergoing a verification process. External verification is one of the approaches used to verify the trauma center. While this method eliminates bias by comparing the hospital’s processes against the external standards, it may not bring tangible benefits in terms of improving compliance with the standards. This is seen in Flodgren et al. (2016) in which they determined that certification did not necessarily lead to compliance with the standards. These findings are crucial to guiding the decision-making when it comes to choosing whether to perform the TCV.

Although some studies discredit verification as a solution to certain quality issues, some experts see it as an approach to making health care safer. Fleshman and Newton (2021) recognize the positive impact brought by facility verification. They point out that the process contributed to successful response to the COVID-19 when the pandemic broke out. These findings can be replicated to the trauma center.

Implementation of Healthcare System Initiative

The specialty hospitals such as the trauma center specialize in the management of specific patient needs. For example, the trauma center focuses on delivering health care services to people with injuries including victims of accidents. Like any other hospital, a trauma center is subject to the regulations and standards that dictate the procedures involved in care delivery, and a healthcare organization that specializes in this area, therefore, should commit to comply with these standards.

To ensure compliance, the organization invites a team of experts to assess the organization’s services against the established standards, pinpointing flaws and strengths. This process is significance in the sense that it helps optimize the quality of health services for the trauma patients. The success of the Trauma Center Verification (TCV), as the process is popularly known, depends on numerous factors including leadership style, communication strategies, and the change management theories used as described in this paper.

Problem Statement

Although providers of medical services are required to meet certain quality and safety standards, cases of medical malpractice are still common, and they largely stem from noncompliance to the protocol for care delivery. In 2013, for example, a patient at Cony Island Hospital lost his life following the blood transfusion error caused by the wrong identification of the patient’s blood type (Oginski, n.d.). This is one of the many incidences which happen when hospitals fail to comply with the laid down standards, and some of these events may cause an increase in the medical expenses.

Some of the negative outcomes associated with malpractice stem from the lack of verification of the trauma center. Due to the lack of verification, these centers may not be in a position to gauge whether they are doing certain things right, and this may potentially expose the organization to the risk of mistakes. To cushion itself against these problems, a trauma center should undergo a verification process.

Review of Literature Related to the Initiative

A number of literature sources explore the subject of the TCV in terms of purpose, effectiveness and benefits. El-Menyar and colleagues (2020), for example, examine whether accrediting the organization can translate to better clinical outcomes, and their results confirm a hypothesis that TVC can bring positive impact to the hospital, and to the patients by reducing hospitalization. However, not everyone see verification as a solution to the clinical issues such as poor quality of treatment because some studies have yielded results that contradict El-Menyar et al. (2020).

Botomen et al. (2021) found that verification does not guarantee a hospital success in terms of the outcomes of the patient care.  Botomen et al. (2021), however, used only 20 subjects for their study, and their results may not be valid.  If one were to consider the validity of the studies to make decisions, therefore, El-Menyar et al. (2020) would be ideal evidence source.

The approaches used in the TCV largely determine the outcomes of the TVC, and a hospital should take this into account when thinking of undergoing a verification process. External verification is one of the approaches used to verify the trauma center. While this method eliminates bias by comparing the hospital’s processes against the external standards, it may not bring tangible benefits in terms of improving compliance with the standards. This is seen in Flodgren et al. (2016) in which they determined that certification did not necessarily lead to compliance with the standards. These findings are crucial to guiding the decision-making when it comes to choosing whether to perform the TCV.

Although some studies discredit verification as a solution to certain quality issues, some experts see it as an approach to making health care safer. Fleshman and Newton (2021) recognize the positive impact brought by facility verification. They point out that the process contributed to successful response to the COVID-19 when the pandemic broke out. These findings can be replicated to the trauma center.

Recommended Leadership Theory or Style